Paul Claesson HUSA
Member
Professional,
Congratulations and welcome to the Hasselblad family.
Paul Claesson
Hasselblad USA
Congratulations and welcome to the Hasselblad family.
Paul Claesson
Hasselblad USA
with H3D I'll buy for shure that 35-90 , I have tried it 2 minutes at Photokina
Anyway I prefer PhaseOne and they are actually working with Mamiya and the new Leica S2, Leica has native .dng then you can keep your software , lightroom ore any
If Hasselblad keep on that way with a very closed system (lenses, software, digital back) I'll think about buying another MF (certainly Leica)
I can do it myself1. Chromatic aberration
2. Distortion
3. Vignetting
why don't you let the possibility to choose between dng or 3FR ? that is a first step for what I call open
I am doing exactly the samefor archiving after postprocessing, I convert all my files into "dng" for the future.
Professional,
Congratulations and welcome to the Hasselblad family.
Paul Claesson
Hasselblad USA
Hasselblad captured to DNG with the H2D in 2005 and moved away from this native format to the 3FR, this compressed file format allowed a much faster rate.
"Closed system" actually I prefer integrated system. Hasselblad was the first in Medium Format to go this route in Photokina 2004 with the H1D, currently we are on our 4th generation DSLR and now our competitors have moved in this direction as well, Phase One is on there 1st gen 645, Leaf has announced their 2nd generation. It would appear to me that there are certain benefits to have a body dedicated to specific digital magazine.
DAC - Digital Auto Correction
1. Chromatic aberration
2. Distortion
3. Vignetting
Hasselblad has mapped 11 lenses in the HC/HCD product line, including combinations with tele-converter, extension tubes and has generated in excess of 70,000 data files used for DAC corrections.
We've implemented Ultrafocus, Firmware updating for digital magazines via Flexcolor and Phocus (since 2005), 3" TFT display ... the list goes on.
Paul Claesson
Hasselblad USA
Paul there is no advantages not to use dng , a camera is a camera and post-processing is something else
most part of pro are using lightroom and photoshop CS4 , I don't want to use Phocus , Flexcolor ... Hasselblad is not my only Camera (Canon 1Ds mark III , canon 5D) and I want only one software for all
I can do it myself
Hasselblad is actually doing what microsoft windows did (and do) : keep quiet , we make ALL for you ! this is not my way and not the way of many pro photographers, I want to shoot with body (sensor) + lenses and see what I get
even with my Canon powershot G10 (350 euros) I can do long exposure
why don't you let the possibility to choose between dng or 3FR ? that is a first step for what I call open
Well, there actually is an advantage to using 3F files, any saved adjustments made, Export to Tiff or Jpeg are stored in the header and can be retrieved at a later date.there is no advantages not to use dng , a camera is a camera and post-processing is something else
I also know many Pro's using "Aperture" which does work with 3FR and 3F files. I do understand as a Pro you use the right tool for the job, same when photographers shot with film, it was not uncommon to see 553ELX next to an RZ67 next to a 4x5 ...most part of pro are using lightroom and photoshop CS4 , I don't want to use Phocus , Flexcolor ... Hasselblad is not my only Camera (Canon 1Ds mark III , canon 5D) and I want only one software for all
You do have the option to "Export to DNG" in Flexcolor, nothing is applied to the 3FR. However, you can choose to import your image into Flexcolor and then take advantage of the Hasselblad RGB input profile and also DAC level 1 is applied.why don't you let the possibility to choose between dng or 3FR ? that is a first step for what I call open
I am doing exactly the same
... why don't they listen ?
I used to think so regarding DNG.I think dng is the way to go , I cannot imagine in 10 years ... so many different RAWs
I understand and we are working in this.But long exposure is my main problem with H3D
Not really , Canon doesn't want to add a MLU button ... and so on for many companiesIs the question "why doesn't Hasselblad listen"
I nearly don't use my Canon , except in the town because you cannot so easily walk with an Hasselblad in the streets ... each girl come to talk with you and you cannot be quiet ))am happy that my first come here and the thread going further, i think there are many things to learn, still i am not a medium format user even i have one now, but i will never give up my Canon DSLR as well.
I nearly don't use my Canon , except in the town because you cannot so easily walk with an Hasselblad in the streets ... each girl come to talk with you and you cannot be quiet ))
But can you buy a H3D II without Hasselblad back ?Phase One mentioned they were working on breaking the code that Hasselblad uses so they can offer Phase One DB for Hasselblad H3D bodies
I'd really love to see a H3 (upgrade for H1/H2) with the ability to use any Back and the new HCD lenses , the H2F does not work with Phase oneI tend to go with those that find this not a positive development.
But can you buy a H3D II without Hasselblad back ?
I'd really love to see a H3 (upgrade for H1/H2) with the ability to use any Back and the new HCD lenses , the H2F does not work with Phase one
that H3D is a wonderful camera was never a question for me