To all and various
The 1.5 crop is the unattractive part of the CFVII -- the attractive parts are the price and the 9 micron photosites.
Shooting the 39 as square would be fine for me. Or flip the camera on its side once in a while with the 39 in vertical.
The film option is always less money if the client pays for the film as they should. But as I see it, Kodak and Fuji aren't really interested in continuing film since they also make the chemistry and sell the lab equipment. And labs are GONE from here. There is one transparency roll film lab in Indianapolis that I know of. The pro labs have shut their doors. Even Walmart won't process film. So mailing the film off for days is NOT an option. Too bad since I'm convinced that digital has a way to go to beat the convenience and ingenuity of film -- self registering, self filtering, self masking in just a tiny thin layer and it rolls up, plus no batteries.
The clientele has been conditioned for instant results now for many years and film is gone, dead and buried here. RIP
I think I'll go with a new 40mm and not the SWC because I've heard of some incompatibilty issues with the 38mm being too close to the sensor.
What is needed is a highly corrected new 30mm lens for the system. I've used the current 30mm and it is horrible -- it is wide but a fisheye. A long time ago I rented an old 40mm and it was not sharp -- hopefully the new ones are.
Maybe someone could make a high quality, grapefruit like, front element that is really wide that would bayonet onto the end of the 80mm-- making it an f2.8 superwide. There is an attachment like that used on the Panasonic LX3 for ultrawide and the photo examples were not that bad. Put a call into Samyang.
BC