I am currently considering moving from my Canon to Hasselblad.
My current setup is a Mark 2 with three f/2.8: a fisheye, a 24-70mm and a 70-200mm, and a 50mm prime f/1.2.
My question is: is it hard moving from zoom lenses to fixed? I am just so used to zooms and if I make the move I will not be able to buy that many lenses, and I am unsure of whether I can get by with only three primes?
Second: Most of the new Hasselblad lenses are f/4 or thereabout. Do you ever feel you miss the bigger aperture, when doing low light photos or portraits etc?
I don't know why but I have always choosen large aperture lenses and I like them that way, but since my focus is becoming more landscape oriented, I guess it won't hurt with smaller ones.
Any info/comments are much appreciated.
Thanks.
My current setup is a Mark 2 with three f/2.8: a fisheye, a 24-70mm and a 70-200mm, and a 50mm prime f/1.2.
My question is: is it hard moving from zoom lenses to fixed? I am just so used to zooms and if I make the move I will not be able to buy that many lenses, and I am unsure of whether I can get by with only three primes?
Second: Most of the new Hasselblad lenses are f/4 or thereabout. Do you ever feel you miss the bigger aperture, when doing low light photos or portraits etc?
I don't know why but I have always choosen large aperture lenses and I like them that way, but since my focus is becoming more landscape oriented, I guess it won't hurt with smaller ones.
Any info/comments are much appreciated.
Thanks.