Somebody can post some shots at 800iso please?
I'm very curious about the result. What do you think about the comparaison between Nikon D3X et H3Dii39 (the same captor as the CFV-39) on dxo website http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Image-Quality-Database/Hasselblad/H3DII-39?
ok...here is an oddity. using the new screen with mask, oriented as landscape mode, the split-image prism collar now has to line up on a horizontal line to work, not a vertical line. it is as if the mask were placed 90 degrees out of position
Very many congratulations to both Jim and Jurgen for being the new proud owners of he CFV39. I hope Brad will follow soon.
On the 800 iso, I think it is not a true 800 iso but a 200 iso pushed by two stops in Phocus post processing. I am saying this because when I open the .fff files in another software it is completely under-exposed. Maybe I am wrong.
Hurra
I will unfortunately not be able to post my first test images , as I have a crashed system after installing SNOW-LEOPARD on my MAC PRO3 .
None of my printers worked after the upgrade and some other applications just don't do anything .
The restore from a backup failed . So I just sit here with a basic equipped LAPTOP and can receive e-mails and can paricipate in the forum . That's all .
I will try my best to post images asap .
Jürgen
Thanks Paul and JAT, this is really interesting.
So, what is the true iso of the CFV39? Would it be correct to assume that any sensor has only one true iso, and that is its base iso? Any higher iso is achieved through pushing the exposure in firmware or PP software. The quality of the higher iso is then determined by the firmware and software's ability in keeping noise, color and sharpness in good control. The limitations of the sensor is then mostly determined by quality and size of its pixel. This, if true, would mean that the CFV16 is more capable of having its exposure pushed, which then means that while the CFV39 has a 800 iso capability, the CFV16 has a 1600 iso capability.
I am just assuming all of this.
You might find this essay from Luminous Landscape informative. The writer talks about problems with Snow Leopard and Epson printers, and how he got them resolved. Seems, for the time being, that Rosetta must be installed.
Read this article - perhaps it will solve some of your current issues with Snow Leopard and your printers.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/woes.shtml
Good luck.
Michael H. Cothran
Michael
Thank you very much for your valuable answer .
Unfortunately , it does not help me any more , because my system is crashed due to the incompatibility of RETROSPECT EXPRESS and SNOW LEOPARD .
I will need help to get me back to OSX 10.5.8 , where everything worked fine .
I think , it was not very wise from APPLE to launch SNOW LEOPARD when there are still many incompatibilities with other applications . Not only EPSON printers . EYELIKE is also a candidate as well as others .
I hope , that my system will be back to where it was before by Wednesday .
I will report about the progress .
Jürgen
the mac i use is amazingly perfect.. there is nothing short of great with it, and having said that.........
if something is perfect why mess with it?
ummmmm....
Very many congratulations to both Jim and Jurgen for being the new proud owners of he CFV39. I hope Brad will follow soon.
On the 800 iso, I think it is not a true 800 iso but a 200 iso pushed by two stops in Phocus post processing. I am saying this because when I open the .fff files in another software it is completely under-exposed. Maybe I am wrong.