Medium Format Forum

Register a free account now!

If you are registered, you get access to the members only section, can participate in the buy & sell second hand forum and last but not least you can reserve your preferred username before someone else takes it.

First results of the CFV39 Part three.

ok...here is an oddity. using the new screen with mask, oriented as landscape mode, the split-image prism collar now has to line up on a horizontal line to work, not a vertical line. it is as if the mask were placed 90 degrees out of position
 
CFV-39 with 903SWC

Dear SWC users, the CFV-39 works perfect with my 903SWC, but don't use the SWC setting, but the Flash Syn with the flash input cable.
Following some preview JPEG's, not corrected, just the image as it came of the sensor.
Aperture 11, 1/4-1/125 sec.

Good luck
 
903 SWC with CFV-39 pictures

Pictures
 

Attachments

  • A__0157_prv.jpg
    EXIF
    A__0157_prv.jpg
    107.6 KB · Views: 84
  • A__0158_prv.jpg
    EXIF
    A__0158_prv.jpg
    84.5 KB · Views: 55
  • A__0159_prv.jpg
    EXIF
    A__0159_prv.jpg
    85 KB · Views: 58
  • A__0160_prv.jpg
    EXIF
    A__0160_prv.jpg
    72.1 KB · Views: 68
  • A__0157_prv.jpg
    EXIF
    A__0157_prv.jpg
    107.6 KB · Views: 84
  • A__0158_prv.jpg
    EXIF
    A__0158_prv.jpg
    84.5 KB · Views: 56
  • A__0159_prv.jpg
    EXIF
    A__0159_prv.jpg
    85 KB · Views: 58
  • A__0160_prv.jpg
    EXIF
    A__0160_prv.jpg
    72.1 KB · Views: 69
Hurra

My CFV-39 has finally arrived .

The first I found were 4 big "coughing spots" on the sensor .
I could clean them using the supplied e-wipe tissues .

Yes John , the split screen is different in the landscape position . Funny .
But it works .

Up to now , everthing else seems to be ok .
More results to follow .

I did not receive a battery and charger with the CFV-39 .
This seems either to be a goody from the dealer or beeing handled different
in the countries where you buy the CFV-39 .

I will unfortunately not be able to post my first test images , as I have a crashed system after installing SNOW-LEOPARD on my MAC PRO3 .
None of my printers worked after the upgrade and some other applications just don't do anything .
The restore from a backup failed . So I just sit here with a basic equipped LAPTOP and can receive e-mails and can paricipate in the forum . That's all .
I will try my best to post images asap .

Jürgen
 
ok...here is an oddity. using the new screen with mask, oriented as landscape mode, the split-image prism collar now has to line up on a horizontal line to work, not a vertical line. it is as if the mask were placed 90 degrees out of position


Regarding what John (jlm) reports and what I found as well , I would like to ask Paul Claesson (HUSA) if this different split screen is made intentionally or might this be an error during production ? ? ?

Jürgen
 
Very many congratulations to both Jim and Jurgen for being the new proud owners of he CFV39. I hope Brad will follow soon.

On the 800 iso, I think it is not a true 800 iso but a 200 iso pushed by two stops in Phocus post processing. I am saying this because when I open the .fff files in another software it is completely under-exposed. Maybe I am wrong.
 
Hello Saad,

You are right.
Higher ISO settings are pushed in software.
It is possible to go a lot further at the expense of resolution.


Paul
 
I understand you feel cheated. That is perfectly understandable.

Maybe look at it this way:
If it works out fine why bother how this higher ISO was achieved.

In fact all manufacturers go the same route.
As far as I understood the pushing is done when going from RAW to JPEG.
Theoretically over 20.000 ISO is possible at 1/4 of the original amount of MP with cameras offering 3200 ISO now.

Paul
 
800i

Saad, you are correct, take the picture at 400i and push it in Phocus with 2 EV's
Very many congratulations to both Jim and Jurgen for being the new proud owners of he CFV39. I hope Brad will follow soon.

On the 800 iso, I think it is not a true 800 iso but a 200 iso pushed by two stops in Phocus post processing. I am saying this because when I open the .fff files in another software it is completely under-exposed. Maybe I am wrong.
 
Thanks Paul and JAT, this is really interesting.

So, what is the true iso of the CFV39? Would it be correct to assume that any sensor has only one true iso, and that is its base iso? Any higher iso is achieved through pushing the exposure in firmware or PP software. The quality of the higher iso is then determined by the firmware and software's ability in keeping noise, color and sharpness in good control. The limitations of the sensor is then mostly determined by quality and size of its pixel. This, if true, would mean that the CFV16 is more capable of having its exposure pushed, which then means that while the CFV39 has a 800 iso capability, the CFV16 has a 1600 iso capability.

I am just assuming all of this.
 
Hurra

I will unfortunately not be able to post my first test images , as I have a crashed system after installing SNOW-LEOPARD on my MAC PRO3 .
None of my printers worked after the upgrade and some other applications just don't do anything .
The restore from a backup failed . So I just sit here with a basic equipped LAPTOP and can receive e-mails and can paricipate in the forum . That's all .
I will try my best to post images asap .

Jürgen

You might find this essay from Luminous Landscape informative. The writer talks about problems with Snow Leopard and Epson printers, and how he got them resolved. Seems, for the time being, that Rosetta must be installed.
Read this article - perhaps it will solve some of your current issues with Snow Leopard and your printers.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/woes.shtml
Good luck.
Michael H. Cothran
 
Saad, Hasselblad quotes that the natural sensitivity of the sensor is 50 iso. I think any higher iso numer is reached through the software and any electronic stuff in the sensor. I must admit I am surprized how clean the pictures are a high iso numbers.

Thanks Paul and JAT, this is really interesting.

So, what is the true iso of the CFV39? Would it be correct to assume that any sensor has only one true iso, and that is its base iso? Any higher iso is achieved through pushing the exposure in firmware or PP software. The quality of the higher iso is then determined by the firmware and software's ability in keeping noise, color and sharpness in good control. The limitations of the sensor is then mostly determined by quality and size of its pixel. This, if true, would mean that the CFV16 is more capable of having its exposure pushed, which then means that while the CFV39 has a 800 iso capability, the CFV16 has a 1600 iso capability.

I am just assuming all of this.
 
You might find this essay from Luminous Landscape informative. The writer talks about problems with Snow Leopard and Epson printers, and how he got them resolved. Seems, for the time being, that Rosetta must be installed.
Read this article - perhaps it will solve some of your current issues with Snow Leopard and your printers.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/woes.shtml
Good luck.
Michael H. Cothran

Michael

Thank you very much for your valuable answer .
Unfortunately , it does not help me any more , because my system is crashed due to the incompatibility of RETROSPECT EXPRESS and SNOW LEOPARD .
I will need help to get me back to OSX 10.5.8 , where everything worked fine .
I think , it was not very wise from APPLE to launch SNOW LEOPARD when there are still many incompatibilities with other applications . Not only EPSON printers . EYELIKE is also a candidate as well as others .
I hope , that my system will be back to where it was before by Wednesday .
I will report about the progress .

Jürgen
 
Michael

Thank you very much for your valuable answer .
Unfortunately , it does not help me any more , because my system is crashed due to the incompatibility of RETROSPECT EXPRESS and SNOW LEOPARD .
I will need help to get me back to OSX 10.5.8 , where everything worked fine .
I think , it was not very wise from APPLE to launch SNOW LEOPARD when there are still many incompatibilities with other applications . Not only EPSON printers . EYELIKE is also a candidate as well as others .
I hope , that my system will be back to where it was before by Wednesday .
I will report about the progress .

Jürgen

I'm glad I read this before it would have been too late!

(hope you fix things quick) I was, too, tempted to upgrade, the marketing and webpage at apple is too good to be true.

the mac i use is amazingly perfect.. there is nothing short of great with it, and having said that, i still feel the 'need' to upgrade after reading the benefits and specs at apple.com

if something is perfect why mess with it?

ummmmm....
 
Very many congratulations to both Jim and Jurgen for being the new proud owners of he CFV39. I hope Brad will follow soon.

On the 800 iso, I think it is not a true 800 iso but a 200 iso pushed by two stops in Phocus post processing. I am saying this because when I open the .fff files in another software it is completely under-exposed. Maybe I am wrong.

My understanding is it is ISO 50 pushed in software with the CFV-39... Still, as was mentioned in another thread, I am not too concerned with how it is done, as long as the results are satisfactory, and with the samples I've seen, they very much are.

Thank you as well for the well-wishes. A delivery truck should be pulling up this morning with a much-anticipated package. I will let you know! :)

Best regards,
-Brad
 
Back
Top