I hope the interest for Contax cameras will stay alive as they are excellent cameras.
They enjoy some of the finest lenses ever made for MF.
I am thinking of the 120 Apo Chromat lens.
I would swap that immediately for my 120 Makro Planar.
20 years of development has given Zeiss new ideas as to how a 120 lens should perform.
Thank you both Don and Paul for the help. I am looking at the ziforums, and vaguely know the admin from the M8 forum. Funny.
I recently decided that my M8 was not going to cover all my interests in photography (I am not a pro, but a graphics programmer, with a deep and lasting interest in photography), and so started accumulating Contax 645 bits, as this was the system I liked the best, when considering the possibilities in backs, lenses, and modern electronics (and prices!). I ended up with the body with both prism and waist-level finders, and the 35/3.5, 80/2 and 120/4 Macro lenses, so far, and just added an adapted Hasselblad 110/2 for portrait duty (hence my interest in the 2000/200 Hassies, as the 6x6 WLF is so much better than a 645 WLF for film). I am considering adding a 50/2.8FE as well, since the jump from 35 -> 80 is rather large, and this way, I would also have a nice two-lens system with the 2000/200 camera.
I got all of this stuff at really great prices, so I am still afloat, but I need to slow down seriously, and take care of life before I go any further. Hence the need to shoot film while I save for the DB (most likely a Sinar eMotion 54 LV). I will of course also continue to shoot my M8, but 35mm and MF are just so different, even a zen-like camera like the Leica
