First real post for me!
"Don't shoot handheld over 1/125!" - Seems to be a rule of thumb to get the sharpest possible images (when shooting handheld that is). Or that's how I've come to understand it by reading around on different forums.
I've been wondering about this statement. I shoot with a 203FE, and the travel time for the focal plane shutter is 1/90. Which should give that no matter if I put the camera in 1/2000 or 1/125 the amount of time it takes to expose the entire frame is 1/90?
Enough to give some sort of blurriness? Does it mean that theoretically FPS cameras would be no good shooting handheld?
In my experience I get good results shooting handheld at 1/90. And I guess it's the real results that matter, if I get good results I get good results, no matter what the technical specification/limitation. I just wanted to know if anyone has felt limited by the 1/90 speed of the 2xx(x) series? Except in flash applications that is.
Cheers!
"Don't shoot handheld over 1/125!" - Seems to be a rule of thumb to get the sharpest possible images (when shooting handheld that is). Or that's how I've come to understand it by reading around on different forums.
I've been wondering about this statement. I shoot with a 203FE, and the travel time for the focal plane shutter is 1/90. Which should give that no matter if I put the camera in 1/2000 or 1/125 the amount of time it takes to expose the entire frame is 1/90?
Enough to give some sort of blurriness? Does it mean that theoretically FPS cameras would be no good shooting handheld?
In my experience I get good results shooting handheld at 1/90. And I guess it's the real results that matter, if I get good results I get good results, no matter what the technical specification/limitation. I just wanted to know if anyone has felt limited by the 1/90 speed of the 2xx(x) series? Except in flash applications that is.
Cheers!