emendoz1
New Member
I guess I will be the first to post!
I've owned a Phase One P 25+ and Hasselblad H2 for over 13 years and used them regularly although I also own many other cameras and used them as well. I use this system and really love the images that it produces. My only gripe is the digital back is limited to it's native sensor size of 22 mp unlike film that can be scanned to almost any size you need. I really love this back and hate to get rid of it although It is heavy, slow and cumbersome compared to my other cameras like Canon, Fuji, and a few more. In the past I have stitched several images together in order to achieve a higher pixel count but this is getting to be cumbersome and sometimes impossible to do due to the nature of the image. I have been thinking of upgrading to the Hasselblad X1D or even the Fujifilm GFX lately because of their smaller size and larger sensor. My only problem is lenses. I have several HC lenses and love the way they render images. I now that Fuji makes great lenses and almost identical to Hasselblad but the cost of changing brands can get expensive. Years ago I swore I'd never play the pixel game and buy the newest camera and I still think it is all dependent on your specific needs. I produce 46 to 75 mp size images from stitching with the Phase One all the time but with a lot of work and can probably create even bigger if I wanted to. My dilemma is at what cost? How much work do I have to do to get what I need, or want? Last night I took some night images with the Hasselblad and Phase One and my back and lungs took a beating. This combination along with two lenses is heavy!
Maybe it's just age?
Has anyone made the change from a heavy medium format system to a lighter MF system and found out later that they miss the prior setup?
Thanks
I've owned a Phase One P 25+ and Hasselblad H2 for over 13 years and used them regularly although I also own many other cameras and used them as well. I use this system and really love the images that it produces. My only gripe is the digital back is limited to it's native sensor size of 22 mp unlike film that can be scanned to almost any size you need. I really love this back and hate to get rid of it although It is heavy, slow and cumbersome compared to my other cameras like Canon, Fuji, and a few more. In the past I have stitched several images together in order to achieve a higher pixel count but this is getting to be cumbersome and sometimes impossible to do due to the nature of the image. I have been thinking of upgrading to the Hasselblad X1D or even the Fujifilm GFX lately because of their smaller size and larger sensor. My only problem is lenses. I have several HC lenses and love the way they render images. I now that Fuji makes great lenses and almost identical to Hasselblad but the cost of changing brands can get expensive. Years ago I swore I'd never play the pixel game and buy the newest camera and I still think it is all dependent on your specific needs. I produce 46 to 75 mp size images from stitching with the Phase One all the time but with a lot of work and can probably create even bigger if I wanted to. My dilemma is at what cost? How much work do I have to do to get what I need, or want? Last night I took some night images with the Hasselblad and Phase One and my back and lungs took a beating. This combination along with two lenses is heavy!
Maybe it's just age?
Has anyone made the change from a heavy medium format system to a lighter MF system and found out later that they miss the prior setup?
Thanks